How are university security teams measuring what good looks like?
For most of its history, university security has been evaluated by what goes wrong. Incidents reported, response times logged, complaints handled. Those are meaningful measures, but they only tell part of the story. They say less about whether the operation that responded was performing as well as it could or how it compares to the way similar institutions approach the same challenges.
The AUCSO Benchmarking Report was the first comprehensive study of security operations across UK higher education – giving the sector, for the first time, a shared basis for understanding what good looks like across structures, staffing, technology and strategic approach. The conversation it has opened is less about identifying problems and more about building a shared language for performance. Here is what that conversation is surfacing.
What does operational performance actually mean in a university security context?
The AUCSO report makes a distinction worth sitting with: performance metrics in university security should go beyond traditional incident indicators to include broader measures of contribution to institutional resilience and wellbeing. That framing shifts the question from “how many incidents occurred?” to “how well did the operation support the institution through them?” and it opens the door to a more complete picture of what security teams are delivering day to day.
The report states that 92% of universities run 24/7 security operations and 91% operate a dedicated security control room. Those figures reflect genuine investment and operational maturity. The interesting question the benchmarking report now makes possible is what happens inside those operations – how performance is tracked, how learning is captured, and how decisions about technology and process are made over time.
How does incident data become a performance tool?
The sector has undergone a significant shift toward structured data collection, with 76% of universities now using digital incident recording systems. The value of that data extends well beyond individual incident management over time, it builds a picture of where and when pressure tends to build, how response patterns vary across a large estate, and whether changes to process or technology are having the effect intended.
When voice recording sits alongside incident logs through platforms like TRBOnet or Orchestrate for example, that picture becomes more complete. Communications and video records, response timelines and incident notes held in one place make it straightforward to review how an operation performed over a week or a month, not just on the day something went wrong. The AUCSO report positions this kind of evidence-based decision making as a direction of travel for the sector: moving from reactive documentation toward proactive insight.
Why integration beats isolated tools
The report draws a clear distinction between viewing security technology as a set of discrete tools and viewing it as an integrated ecosystem. That distinction matters more as estates grow more complex and the volume of data generated by security systems increases.
When Motorola Solutions CCTV, MOTOTRBO two way radio, WAVE PTX BBPTT, body-worn cameras and incident records connect through a platform like Orchestrate, the operational picture available to a control room and to security managers reviewing performance is substantially richer than any single system provides alone. Decisions about resourcing, deployment patterns and process changes can be grounded in a fuller view of what the operation is actually doing, rather than what individual systems are capturing separately.
Where does the picture become incomplete?
One area the benchmarking conversation is beginning to surface is the edge of the security network – the people who work on campus but sit outside the core communications system. Contractors, event stewards, temporary maintenance staff and volunteers are all part of how a university functions on its busiest days, but they often operate on separate channels or rely on mobile phones. WAVE PTX for example extends push-to-talk to smartphone users without additional hardware, bringing those workers into the same operational network as the core security team.
A sector finding its benchmarks
The AUCSO Benchmarking Report 2025 reflects a sector becoming more deliberate about what good security operations look like, not just in terms of technology deployed, but in how performance is understood, measured and improved over time. The seven critical trends it identifies, from professionalisation of security functions to the shift toward integrated technology platforms, point in a consistent direction: university security is moving from a reactive, incident-led model toward something more strategic and evidence-based.
For universities thinking through where they sit in that landscape, the next question is what this shift means in practice: where are the gaps in their current approach, and what could a more connected operational picture reveal that separate systems cannot.
You might also be interested in…
Let’s start a conversation.
Provide the following information and we’ll put you in touch with the right person.
